Work/MS Mode
Composable Commerce

A ROADMAP TOWARDS COMPOSABLE COMMERCE

MS Mode wanted to move away from a monolithic architecture. We scored every e-commerce capability with their team, put impact next to effort, and handed them a roadmap they could take to the board.

Customer MS Mode
Client MS Mode
Sector Fashion retail
Service Composable Commerce
Engagement Roadmap and business case
The challenge

They knew where they wanted to go. Not where to start.

MS Mode runs on a platform that carries most of the stack. They want to move away from that monolithic setup towards an ecosystem with a separate content management system and best-of-breed solutions that work together.

What they did not have was a starting point. Which parts to move first, what the move buys them, what it costs, and whether staying put was the better answer for some of it.

So they asked us for a roadmap and a business case they could take to the board.

MS Mode storefront
MS Mode operates over 200 stores across the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Spain and Luxembourg.
What we did

Score the landscape, then let the matrix set the order

A composable journey is a sequence of decisions, and each one costs money. We built the framework to make those decisions comparable, and we made them together with the MS Mode team rather than for them.

01

Build the framework and score it

We listed every capability you need to run an e-commerce operation, then walked through all of them with the team and formed one shared view: which solution covers what, and how well.

02

Plot impact over effort

The scores went into an impact-effort matrix. Highest impact for the lowest effort at the top, the rest in line behind it.

03

Sequence and cost it

Which solutions to replace, in what order, how long each step takes, and how much budget it needs.

04

Write the decision document

One document for the board: the roadmap, the reasoning behind the order, and the budget the execution needs.

The result

Decisions with something underneath them

1
capability framework, scored once, agreed by the whole team
4
questions asked of every capability in the landscape
0
systems replaced on gut feeling alone
1
sequenced and costed roadmap, ready for the board

Gut feeling pointed at a few solutions that felt due for replacement. Next to their effort, the impact did not justify it, so those solutions stayed and will be improved where they are. The budget moved to parts of the landscape that were not obvious at the start. That is the whole point of doing the exercise before the migration.

How we scored it

Four questions per capability

Coverage

Which solution fulfils this capability today, and is that the solution you think it is?

Promise

Does that solution live up to what it was bought to do, in practice and not on paper?

Satisfaction

Are the people who work with it every day satisfied with it? Their answer counts as data.

Replaceability

How hard would it be to swap it out for something else in a composable landscape?

Scoring workshop
What we delivered

Three artefacts, one decision

Capability scorecard

Every e-commerce capability, the solution behind it, how well that solution performs, and how replaceable it is.

Impact-effort matrix

Every candidate for replacement, placed on impact and effort. The order of the roadmap comes straight out of it.

Roadmap and decision document

Sequence, duration and budget per step, written so the board can approve it and the team can start on it.

Carsten Klomp, Brighting

“Going composable is not the goal. Knowing which parts are worth replacing, and being able to show the board why, is.”

Carsten Klomp, Brighting
What we brought

A framework of our own, and a blueprint we did not invent

We have sat on the client side of this decision. That is the perspective we bring to it.

E-commerce Capability Framework

Every capability an e-commerce operation needs, with a score, a satisfaction read and a replaceability read per capability.

MACH reference architecture

We used the MACH Alliance reference framework as the blueprint for how the services in a composable landscape integrate.

Capability scoring Scoring workshop Impact-effort matrix Roadmap Budget estimate Board decision document

More of our work

All cases →
ASICS

Full readiness assessment for AI scalability across 42 capabilities

42 capabilities scored · 2-week assessment
ASICS

Eight weeks from signing to the first agent live

8 weeks to first agent live
HEMA

Real-time pricing on every shelf, in every store

800+ stores live · 4-year partnership

Thinking about leaving your monolith?

We score your landscape with your team, put impact next to effort, and hand you a roadmap with a budget on it. Then you decide what moves and what stays.

+31 20 210 13 90 info@brighting.nl Grasweg 183, 1031 HX Amsterdam